Columnist Sid Salter writes that observers believe the court could limit the use of race-based legal remedies to protect ...

Gutting the civil rights law has been a long game, and its opponents have long found a champion in Chief Justice John Roberts.

North Carolina NAACP President and "Moral Monday" protest leader William Barber writes that the Supreme Court decision to gut the Voting Rights Act "is a step back that summons us all of us to step up ...

The Supreme Court could eliminate a crucial part of the Voting Rights Act, enacted 60 years ago to prevent racial ...

The conservative justices appear ready to gut Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The only question is how. The Supreme Court ...

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has been imploring his colleagues for decades to gut a crucial part of the iconic Voting Rights Act that prohibits practices denying Blacks, Hispanics and other ...

The Supreme Court will convene on Wednesday to hear a legal battle over Louisiana's congressional map that could reverberate ...

There’s no basis in our precedent to suggest that any statute must be dissolved simply because of the passage of time.

As the Voting Rights Act turns 60, its legacy is under siege—from courts, lawmakers, and a government retreating from enforcement. The battle to preserve it is now a fight for the future of democracy ...

The US Supreme Court is set to decide a pivotal case that could reshape how race factors into American elections. In ...

The U.S. Supreme Court appears inclined to limit the Voting Rights Act's ability to force states to draw electoral districts ...

It is clear enough that the United States can bring suit under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. But can private litigants bring such a suit? Nothing in the text of the statute expressly grants that ...